Mobile Tech Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 31 October 2012

Javascript application testing - Firebug

Posted on 20:43 by Unknown
Recently I was testing a Javascript application. By Javascript application what I mean, is that a lot of the business logic was written on client side. Now it's a reasonably well known fact that client side logic is easily by-passable.

There's plenty of ways to do it ..intercept in Burp, delete the Javascript from the cache folder on your disk, create your own forms or use Firebug. Maybe more. Largely though I find that a combination of manual probing to detect where client side validation is being used, intercepting every single request for every file type and then dropping the Javascript request responsible...works.

There are times though, like in my last application where the entire UI of the app is constructed client side, where dropping Javascript will not load the app at all or mess it up bigtime. So Burp, in such cases, while you can still certainly use it...is not the best tool for the job. The next thing you will hear, if you google about 'Client side testing' is that 4 out of 5 people will say - Use Firebug.

Now once you understand it, it's an absolutely fabulous little tool to use but until then, it can get a little frustrating to use. So what I'm going to do here is to just point out the features I use the most and why I do so.

Inspect Element

The first feature that I use a lot is the 'Inspect Element'. You can open up Firebug and click the button that's highlighted in Red below and then move your mouse over the upper half of the page. As you hover over each part of the page, the corresponding part of the HTML in Firebug will start flashing. It's all in real time.

When you're clear which bit of the page you want to look at in Firebug, click on that element. Firebug too will stop flashing around. I tend to use this a lot when I want to look at the attributes set for a particular form. For example: If I want to check if the autocomplete attribute has been set on the password element, I can focus just on that and click. Then I can read the HTML on that page in the lower pane.

















If you want to change the maximum length of an input field in a form, you can double click on the bit you want to change, and enter a new value. The key here is to ensure that whatever you're typing in is syntactically correct otherwise Firebug won't make the change and will leave you frustrated. For example: If you're entering a string, make sure you put it between double quotes.

Javascript

If you want to change just a part of the Javascript on a page, click on the script tab and then reload the page. All the Javascripts on that page will get loaded. Now you can click on the little drop down there (marked in Red) and see all the Javascript loaded. Click on any one to load it up in Firebug. Don't keep clicking on the dropdown marked in Blue. That's just the main tab that you can use to get there.



If it's a small application you might want to manually review the Javascript on each page. Click menu - Let Javascript load - Review. Repeat the cycle. If it's a huge application like the one I was testing though, there's a high chance you'll go mad very quickly :). Trust me. So you need an upgrade to your testing technique. That's where the DOM tab comes in.

DOM

Anything that's loaded in the browser will read/write something from the DOM. Now lets say you loaded a page up which dealt with logging in to an application and you want to check if the authentication logic is client side. That'd be a rare thing and largely quite a stupid thing to do, but it'll do for now :).

So if it is, there's a chance that some JS functions are being called. But you don't know which one and in which Javascript. So as soon as the login page loads, click on the DOM tab and scroll down a little. In whatever Javascript applications I've seen, there's usually a tree full of elements at the top of the DOM. All the reading and writing from/to the DOM happens here. Just below that though there is a large list of functions (all in green font) as shown in the figure below.



Now read through all of those names and make a little list of which functions 'sound' like performing a login sequence. If you click on each of those functions in the DOM, you'll immediately jump to the Javascript which has the code for that function. NOW you can study just that code and see if its insecure. Yes, you're still studying code..sure..but at least the scope is reduced a little.



Setting Breakpoints

Now we've made progress and come up to a point where you know what bit of code is "possibly" doing what. I say possibly, because you haven't actually run it or in this case, clicked on the login button to actually make it happen and see if THAT function is triggered. Let's now confirm that.

If you look at the screen-shot below it'll show you the exact line number on which those 2 functions are called. You want to make sure that those ARE called. So you set a breakpoint on those lines. A breakpoint, for anyone reading this and not too familiar with the term does what it says. It breaks. Breaks what? Execution. Of what? Code. What code? Javascript. When? When I click login.

So I'm just saying..I'll click Login and if the code here is triggered and my guess was right..don't go on. Stop right there. Set breakpoints as follows..set it on the first line of the function and not the definition itself. I'm not sure the line that has "function" is triggered; it may be..I'm just not sure as I haven't had success. Here's a screen-shot with the breakpoints.


Now try and login..

Yeah..actually put in a user-name and password..and login. If your function guess was right, you should stop right where you put a breakpoint. If it doesn't stop, it's the wrong path flow for THAT function. So maybe there's some other place login is called. Search for all such instances..and whenever you see a function with login in it...set a breakpoint.  Here's a screenshot where I've searched for login, a breakpoint has triggered and the credentials I entered can be seen in the Right side pane.



Now it's like Burp inside a browser window :). Read. Edit. Forward. Only the forward button here is the Continue button .. the right pointing arrow. If you want to go Step By Step and see what happens...and many times you will want to do this, you can use the Step Into or F11 key to now proceed line by line and watch the path the code takes. Again..when you're editing stuff..make sure you are syntactically correct. Otherwise the change will not persist.

Adding to the DOM

So the last cool feature in Firebug that I'll go over today is how you go about adding an element to the DOM. So suppose you want to add a parameter called 'admin' and set its value to 'YES' so you can try logging in as admin, you have to use the Firebug console to do so. So first decide where you want to add the property.

















Once you're clear right click on a different property; in this case any root element like PR_TAB_WIDTH and say "Copy Path". Then click on the leftmost tab called Console and paste the path into the bar at the bottom and change its name and value. Like this..


And hit Enter. Now go to the DOM and you should see a new property called Admin with the value YES. It didn't work here of course..to give me admin privileges, but you get what I am trying to say :)






So that's it...start playing around with Firebug, it's a supremely powerful tool, specially when you're testing JS applications. Until next time..Cya :)
Read More
Posted in add, appsec, breakpoints, client side, console, dom, element, firebug, javascript | No comments

Tuesday, 30 October 2012

Salt your passwords = Existing accounts password reset

Posted on 22:23 by Unknown
This one is just a simple conclusion that I drew when a customer had MD5 hashed passwords in his database and we recommended them to salt them instead and use PBKDF as the algorithm of choice.

Now the customer added code in, but left the old code in as well which did the simple hash comparisons. So I asked them why and they said..for old users. I started thinking about it and it made sense. Here's why:

Think of it. I have a MD5 password in the database. Say I add a new column for 'salt' , generate 1000 random hashes..one for each user..and add a new column. I then change the code to query the DB for the 'salt' as well, when a person logs in and run the user's password through the PBKDF function before comparing it with the hash. Looks good?

Sure. Except that no one will be able to login. Why? It's super secure now :). No one can find any more vulnerabilities inside. Jokes apart, what's happening here? Lets say the user's original password was abc123 and it had a 32 bit MD5 hash XYZ. Now when the user logs in something like MD5(user entered password) runs..hashes what he entered and compares it to the stored hash. Match? Login successful.

Now there's the salt. So when the user logs in, the new 'salt+pbkdf' code is triggered. So PBKDF(userpwd + salt) is calculated and compared to ..what? The stored MD5 hash. Is there ever going to be a match? Largely no. Because..there is no way you can predict the salt for a particular hash..BEFORE you store it in the DB. Remember those 1000 salts you generated? All random? Did you check if they'd give you the user's password after "decryption"? Nope.

So since there's no way to get the "right salt" for each user ID, the easiest solution is to force a password reset across users. The next time they login everything will automatically fall into place.
Read More
Posted in database, hash, password, pbkdf, salt, secure | No comments

Wednesday, 24 October 2012

Incremental code review - MD5 hashes

Posted on 21:15 by Unknown
This one is a reasonably obvious tip to be frank. I was recently doing a code review retest for a Java app. Now I don't know too much Java so I was finding it hard stepping through code.

One thing I knew though was that if you have the previous code base and the current one and are "re-testing" it's helpful to see which files have changed. Now anyone with a little Linux experience or programming experience will immediately say 'diff'. And yeah..diff is fine..but that will give you a very detailed listing in a slightly cryptic form. Its readable enough if you go slow, but it's not the first step IMO. I'd like a slightly more high level view first. That's how I stumpled upon md5deep.

So I go into the first root directory of the old code and run md5deep -rl > old_list there. Then I change directories to the new code and run md5deep -rl -X old_list > changes over here. Basically all it means is that I compared the new list against the old. Once I have my changes, I know that any fixes they made MUST be in some of those files.

Now I can run diff on each of those file combinations to search a little bit slowly. It's the same really..but it gives me a little more control over the process.

A tip here to further reduce changes is to use md5deep with grep to filter your results out. So I knew I was looking only for java file changes...so I could either do something like:

md5deep -rl -X old_list| egrep -i '.java$'

OR

md5deep -rl * -X ~/list_md5_old |egrep -v ".doc$|.DS_Store|.js|xml|changed_files|hibernate" > changed_files;wc -l changed_files

I used the 2nd one :) coz I knew what all I didn't want. If you don't know that..start with what you know and filter on from there.

There's a million ways of doing this of course; I just dropped in what I did :). Here's the blog post which saved me some time..

http://linhost.info/2010/02/checksum-a-directory-with-md5deep/
Read More
Posted in code, hash, incremental, md5deep, review | No comments

Friday, 7 September 2012

Cross Domain XHR

Posted on 12:44 by Unknown
Recently I was doing a project (REST web services) where there was an interesting implementation of a defense against CSRF attacks. You would login to the application and immediately be assigned a session ID in a cookie; along with this you would also be assigned an AntiCSRF token, in another cookie. Now this immediately means that both cookies are going to be sent across to the server each time and going to be verified each time. Hence, if this had been the only defense it would be pretty useless; as the additional cookie does..nothing.

In the application though, what was happening was..the cookie 'token' was read, its value grabbed and a new custom header called X-Security-token added in the header with its value. So if on login I get a cookie: token=abcd, the next time I say...do an Edit Profile...I have a new HTTP header called X-Security-token: abcd as part of the request header.

Now my first thought was, Ha, spoofable...the attacker just needs to write a little Javascript, read the cookie (document.cookie) and then add a new custom header and send the request off.

The data was all in JSON format and I wanted a POC to show so I thought I'd just have a simple HTML file with some Jquery code which would make an XHR request by doing all the stuff I talked about above. The code seemed all okay when I tested it on localhost. As in..I set a cookie with the domain as localhost and value as 'arvind' and tried writing JQuery to pick it up and create a new header. That worked and the request DID read the cookie, append it to the header..and send a request to localhost.

The moment I changed the URL to the actual site URL, the request never even fired. I could understand it if the cookie didn't get sent but the request never fired either. More reading revealed that this was due to XHR's limitation of sending cross origin requests. It just refused to send anything at all; I couldn't even see anything in Firebug. I change the URL to localhost..immediately an XHR request gets fired. I tried removing the cookie and resending it...no luck..same behavior. Posts to localhost. Okay. Anywhere else. Browser doesn't allow sending an XHR request anywhere else. Not yet totally clear what's happening.

The other strange thing though is that there is this addon called a REST client which is installed in the same browser and seems to be able to make calls happily to multiple domains other than localhost.

So the question is..What is the difference between an HTML file hosted on a local web server..making XHR calls to abcbank.com AND a firefox addon making calls (not sure if its XHR as I did not see an X-Requested-With header) to abcbank.com? Why does the latter work?

So as a CSRF protection...it doesn't seem safe but I'm not able to get it working with XHR at least. There's some suggestions elsewhere that some versions of Flash allow this; but right now I'm not sure. I'll update this later if I stumble upon something.
Read More
Posted in browser, crossdomain, csrf, same origin, xhr | No comments

Sunday, 26 August 2012

SoapUI - XML Entity Injection

Posted on 02:33 by Unknown
So another thing that I tried out with some help from the guys I work with was this attack called XML Entity Injection. It has been around for quite a while and there are plenty of resources on it so I won't talk about it too much. Here is an OWASP reference and another link which was quite cool and explained things well.

In my previous post I described how to use SoapUI through Stunnel to test HTTPS web services. So following up on that, I was using SoapUI to test XXE attacks as well. So I followed stuff given above on the link to try and read the passwd file from the remote machine (which I'd confirmed was a Ubuntu box). To my pleasant surprise it immediately worked and the entire /etc/passwd file got displayed in the Soap response. Yay. Victory jig. And all that ;)

I was brought down to earth though when I saw an account called 'arvind' in the response. For some stupid reason, SoapUI was retrieving my own passwd file and displaying it in the response. Huh?

So I set Burp up again and set Intercept to on to see what was happening. To my surprise, the request itself already had my passwd file..and the response was just reflecting it back. So even before hitting my own client proxy SoapUI had done 'something' with my request, expanded my own entities and THEN sent it to Burp. It wasn't ever reaching the server directly. Meaning..if I used SoapUI there wasn't any way to directly test XXE...unless there was some tweak somewhere where I could turn off request parsing.

Anyway since I had Burp as well in my proxy chain before it hit the server, it didn't really matter and I could test it in Burp. Turned out that the server was not vulnerable at all. Oh well. Maybe next time it will be ;)
Read More
Posted in attack, burp, entity, external, injection, soapui, xml, xxe | No comments

SoapUI to Burp - Fuzz away

Posted on 00:57 by Unknown
I was recently testing another web service (lot of them recently) and was using SoapUI as a client to invoked the WSDL. You don't HAVE to use SoapUI; its just that it was the most popular tool out there and seemed to do its job.

So one of the main tests in a web service is to fuzz all the methods. For the new guys it just means the following:

a) Identify the method and find out what arguments it has
b) Find out what valid arguments need to be passed for the method to work
c) Fill each argument with a huge bunch of malicious data specific to SQL Inj or XSS or any other type of injection and see how the server reacts

Now you could do this manually and put in a ' , < , > , #, OR 1=1 and so on manually and see what responses you get back. That, I guarantee you is not going to be too much of fun after around 10 minutes max :). So you want to automate this process.

SoapUI has its own security scan from version 4.0 onwards and this is what a large number of people working with web services tend to use. I'm not sure what I was doing wrong, but the free version allowed me to scan just 4 specific parameters [username, password, request and one more]. It has a huge number of scans; SoapUI but if it is not going to allow to me to fuzz the parameters I want, it kinda is useless. Maybe its because I was using the free version and the Pro version supports scanning all parameters. Anyone tried that out? If not, no worries, I will ..sometime :)

So now I thought of chaining SoapUI to Burp and using Burp to do all my fuzzing instead. This turned out to be harder than I thought and frustratingly very little good help on how to do it. Note that it was a HTTPS connection; if its HTTP it is easy enough. SoapUI seems to have something called a HTTP Tunnel which I guess you have to configure with keystores and trust stores...but whatever I did I couldn't get it to work. And I couldn't find any other fuzzers which would reliably work. I am sure there might well be something...I was on a deadline though; you know how that goes.

So I pinged a few of my colleagues for help and Max helpfully suggested that I use stunnel to make the SSL connection to the server instead. That actually worked and  I could get everything working. Here is what I did and why it worked.

a) Set SoapUI proxy settings to Burp - File: Preferences: Proxy Settings. Now load up any 1 request in the SoapUI request editor and edit its Endpoint to point to http://abcbank.com:443/blah/blah instead of https://abcbank.com:443/blah/blah. So it means...if you want a response for this method go to http://abcbank.com:443. This is just to ensure that the request gets to Burp...in the first place. If you keep the endpoint as https it gives you a 'Cannot cast to HTTP' error. I think that is because the proxy setting in SoapUI is ONLY for http.

b) Start Burp

c) Open Terminal (Ubuntu) ..probably CMD on Windows although untested and start stunnel as follows: sudo stunnel -cf -d 127.0.0.1:443 -r www.abcbank.com:443

d) Go to Burp - Options - Hostname resolution. This is the one to the left of the Alerts tab and set  the hostname of the remote site to 127.0.0.1. So you should have an entry in there which is Enabled and says:
www.abcbank.com 127.0.0.1

e) Load the WSDL up in SoapUI and invoke any method. Look into Burp; you should see a request in its history. Look into stunnel; you should see some data getting written to its console [Service stunnel3 accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:50318]. Yay. Done :).

f) The request is now in Burp. Uncheck the Enabled box in the Hostname Options in Burp. Now have fun with Burp Intruder/Scanner as usual.

For the curious..what exactly happened and why did this work? Well to start off, we simply set a proxy for SoapUI, so anything from SoapUI will go to Burp. Now Burp, like any other proxy needs to forward a request it got to the destination, else it'd be useless rt? ;)

Now just like your browser resolves a hostname to try and open up a site for you, Burp needs to do that as well...but it first looks into its hostname section to see if you've hard coded something there. You have..in this case.. www.abcbank.com = 127.0.0.1. So the SoapUI request goes to 127.0.0.1.

What's the destination port when you sent it from SoapUI? 443. And we haven't changed that in Burp. Its just a different hostname..that's all. So the traffic gets sent to 127.0.0.1:443.

And what's listening on 127.0.0.1:443? Stunnel of course. And Stunnel has been configured with the -r argument to forward all its traffic to abcbank.com:443.. So stunnel, since it understands SSL..completes the HTTPS connection with abcbank.com and returns the response to Stunnel - Burp and then SoapUI as well. Very very neat :)

Oh and once you have all of SoapUI's requests in Burp, you don't need to use SoapUI any more; you can just use the awesome Burp. You also do not need Stunnel anymore..as Burp can understand HTTPS by itself. The reason we needed Stunnel was because SoapUI did not seem to directly understand SSL. I am NOT stating this as fact..because I'm not sure; but certainly, from what I searched and worked with, it isn't that easy.

I hope that helps anyone who is trying to get this setup. Again big thanks to Max, Google ;) and this post.
Read More
Posted in burp, chain, penetration, pentest, proxy, soapui, ssl, stunnel, web service | No comments

Thursday, 2 August 2012

ASMX Webservices - XSS

Posted on 10:44 by Unknown
I tested a few public Web services recently. 1 of them had a front end so it was easier to visualize but that apart it was quite tough, specially as numerous methods were so complex that the developers had a tough time trying to answer some of my questions.

Now assuming that the application that consumes the web services is not in testing scope, all you have is the .asmx and the .wsdl. At times, these methods might be invokable from the browser itself, via the ASMX web interface like this. Other times invoking is restricted to the local machine alone, in which case you have to use a third party client like SoapUI or write your own using a library. I wrote mine using a library called Suds (Python). Obviously, writing the client is more work and if the arguments that need to be passed are complex, it can be quite tricky.

There are 2 ways to test for SQL Injection or XSS. In my case I could invoke the methods via the browser, so that made it easier and I could find a SQL injection.

a) You can code your custom client and fuzz through that.
b) You can simply write a very simple client, with Burp set as a proxy. You can then use Burp Intruder or its inbuilt scanner to fuzz the application.

I wasn't lucky with the XSS though. The content type of the response was text/xml. I saw a few attack vectors for XSS in xml but all of them involved closing the existing XML tag but for any of them..I'd have to break out of the existing structure. And < and > were getting encoded..to &lt and &gt. So unless I could do that, I couldn't see anything anywhere that would make this vulnerable to XSS.

And much like my Flash post earlier, the content type is text/xml. So unless I could find a way to get a browser to forcefully treat it as text/html, there wasn't going to be a way to do this.

A colleague said this - "...In terms of triggering XSS it will be harder unless you can convince the client to render it using an XSLT" coz that would convert the XML into HTML. But I wasn't sure how I'd go about this. And then I ran out of time :).

So here I am. You guys know of how this is possible?

Update: I posted to the list and had a few ideas here.

Read More
Posted in asmx, content-type, cross, scripting, site, web service, wsdl, xml, xss | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Nvidia has a Logan-powered Shield 2 console in development!!!
    Nvidia CEO Jen-Hsun Huang has revealed to  Engadget  that a successor to the Shield is in development, and it will likely be powered by a ne...
  • John Carmack isn't convinced that Steam Machines will be a hit!!!
    Gaming legend John Carmack recently took the stage at  Nvidia’s Montreal conference  where he  talked  a bit on the subject of Valve and the...
  • Yahoo Tops Google In Web Traffic Again!!!
    NEW YORK (AP) — For the third month in a row, more Americans visited Yahoo's websites than Google's, according to comScore Inc.'...
  • Google Nexus 5: The geekysupport Review!!!
    It’s that time of the year again, where Google releases a new Nexus handset for those wanting a cheap yet powerful device running stock Andr...
  • 20 Life Hacks and Tools to Boost Productivity on Your Computer!!!
    With the flood of  new technologies , websites, apps, news, work files, pictures, articles and the like, staying organized and focused is be...
  • A peek at the inside of Sony's PlayStation 4!!!
    See  what's inside the PlayStation 4 with these exclusive photos  Inside Sony headquarters, at the heart of Tokyo’s Shinagawa district, ...
  • EMC Defenders CTF - Week 3 - Contest 14 - Reversing
    I played the EMC defenders CTF with a few of my friends a while back. We sadly couldn't complete all the challenges. All the same it was...
  • Asus reveals Chromecast-like Miracast Dongle, has new smartphone and Chromebook line-ups on the way!!!
    Asus has made its way mainly in the PC business for quite some time now, but new reports have  surfaced pointing at the company looking to e...
  • ASRock unveils a pair of motherboards designed specifically for Bitcoin mining!!!
    Those looking to generate some extra cash by mining for Bitcoin now have a couple of new hardware options courtesy of ASRock. The motherboar...
  • Why and how to set up your own wiki with Dokuwiki!!!
    DokuWiki is a simple but versatile wiki. Find out how to install, configure, and begin using DokuWiki.  A couple of weeks ago, I had to set ...

Categories

  • 100
  • 12.04
  • 2.2
  • 2013
  • 21
  • 4848
  • 8080
  • add
  • alternative
  • analysis
  • android
  • apk
  • app
  • applet
  • applets
  • appletviewer
  • application
  • appsec
  • asmx
  • assembly
  • attack
  • attacks
  • basic
  • basics
  • beginner
  • blazeds
  • blog
  • book
  • books
  • breakpoint
  • breakpoints
  • browser
  • burp
  • CALL
  • capture
  • certificate
  • chain
  • cheops
  • client side
  • code
  • conference
  • console
  • content-type
  • coverage
  • CRLF
  • cross
  • crossdomain
  • csrf
  • ctf
  • customer service
  • database
  • deblaze
  • debug
  • debugger
  • decision
  • defcon
  • delete
  • deleting
  • dll
  • dogbert
  • dom
  • dynamic
  • element
  • emulator
  • encryption
  • engineering
  • entity
  • environment
  • example
  • executable
  • external
  • firebug
  • flash
  • flex
  • FlourineFX
  • flow
  • flowchart
  • forensics
  • fs
  • fuzz
  • glassfish
  • graph
  • handbook
  • harden
  • hash
  • hints
  • hit
  • hittrace
  • howto
  • IDA
  • idapro
  • IDB
  • immunity
  • in use
  • incremental
  • inetsim
  • injection
  • install
  • introduction
  • java
  • java.policy
  • javaee
  • javascript
  • jks
  • jump
  • keyboard
  • lab
  • loaderdata
  • malware
  • management
  • mapper
  • market
  • MD Description
  • MD FAQ
  • MD Technical Support
  • MD Updates
  • MD User Guide
  • md5deep
  • mount
  • msdn
  • network
  • newbie
  • olly
  • ollydbg
  • options
  • packet
  • password
  • pbkdf
  • pcap
  • peb
  • peb_ldr_data
  • penetration
  • pentest
  • permissions
  • phone
  • pkcs12
  • policytool
  • port
  • practical
  • procedure
  • proxy
  • resign
  • resignation
  • response
  • restrict
  • reverse
  • reversing
  • review
  • salt
  • same origin
  • sample
  • scripting
  • sdk
  • secure
  • security
  • set
  • setup
  • sharif
  • shortcuts
  • SI
  • signed
  • site
  • snapshot
  • soapui
  • source
  • splitting
  • ssl
  • start
  • static
  • steps
  • stunnel
  • superblock
  • support
  • test
  • thoughts
  • thread
  • tips
  • tool
  • tools
  • tor
  • trace
  • truecrypt
  • tutorial
  • ubuntu
  • umask
  • understand
  • university
  • unsigned
  • video
  • view
  • virgin
  • virtual
  • virtual box
  • virtual machine
  • virtualbox
  • vm
  • watch
  • web
  • web application
  • web service
  • work
  • wsdl
  • xhr
  • xml
  • xss
  • xxe

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (496)
    • ▼  November (143)
      • EMC Defenders CTF - Week 3 - Contest 14 - Reversing
      • Report details Intel Broadwell-K CPUs, Iris Pro gr...
      • What happens if you plug an Xbox One into... itsel...
      • Google completes upgrading its SSL certificates to...
      • Honda, Hyundai and Toyota showcase vehicles powere...
      • Valve readying invites for local game streaming be...
      • Liquid metal alloy could allow hobbyists to print ...
      • AMD is giving away 1,000 copies of Battlefield 4 o...
      • Acer's replacement CEO resigns before taking offic...
      • Jury awards Apple $290 million in patent infringem...
      • HBO Go now supports Chromecast on both iOS and And...
      • Half-Life mod Black Mesa approved for sale on Stea...
      • Xbox One teardown reveals standard PC hardware com...
      • University in Cyprus becomes world's first to acce...
      • Adobe opens $9.99 per month Photoshop + Lightroom ...
      • Building a coding machine becomes fun with the $99...
      • Motorola signs deal with 3D Systems to help build ...
      • Google sends out developer invites to Chromecast h...
      • Sprint finishes dead last in Consumer Reports' lat...
      • MediaFire's new desktop file-sharing client brings...
      • Infographic: A timeline of Sony's PlayStation fran...
      • FCC may allow passengers to make in-flight cellula...
      • Pogoplug launches $49 Safeplug to anonymize your h...
      • Silk Road mastermind allegedly ordered six murders...
      • Intel Atom SoC roadmap updated, new chips and 64-b...
      • Upcoming MMORPG by Ex-Blizzard devs, WildStar to b...
      • A Software Challenge: Why Users Uninstall Apps!!!
      • geeky support 2013 gift Guide/recommendations!!!
      • Yahoo to announce the hire of Katie Couric as 'Glo...
      • Microsoft matches Sony, sells over a million Xbox ...
      • What Black Friday deals are you eyeballing this ye...
      • Instagram said to be working on private messaging ...
      • Doom co-creator John Carmack resigns from id Softw...
      • Motorola signs deal with 3D Systems to help build ...
      • The state of self-driving cars, Intel details upco...
      • Xbox One Review!!!
      • Qualcomm reveals new Snapdragon 805 processor with...
      • MediaTek showcases world's first true octa-core mo...
      • Logitech releases PowerShell controller with integ...
      • Firefox’s streamlined “Australis” user interface l...
      • Flickr rolls out new printed photo book options st...
      • Greedy wireless carriers aren't interested in smar...
      • New details on Elder Scrolls Online campaign, stor...
      • Google launches free prepaid debit card, links to ...
      • End of an era: Winamp is shutting down after more ...
      • Are you sure you're clean?
      • John McAfee Responds To Wrongful Death Lawsuit!!!
      • Google Nexus 5: The geekysupport Review!!!
      • Tesla chief Elon Musk updates Model S warranty to ...
      • Command & Conquer not dead after all, revival immi...
      • MOGA unveils the Ace Power gamepad for iPhone, iPo...
      • Yahoo to encrypt all products in light of NSA spyi...
      • Call of Duty: Ghosts patch adds e-sports features,...
      • Sony's $399 PlayStation 4 costs roughly $381 to bu...
      • Snapchat turns down $3 billion acquisition offer f...
      • Samsung has now shipped 800,000 Galaxy Gears, new ...
      • Snapchat surpasses photo sharing activities of Fac...
      • Nokia Lumia 2520 available at Verizon this week, p...
      • Valve set to reveal its own Steam integrated virtu...
      • Google to pay $17 million for unauthorized trackin...
      • New Toshiba Kira Ultrabook lasts 22 hours on a sin...
      • Senate hosts hearing on Bitcoin and other virtual ...
      • Apple reportedly buying PrimeSense, the company be...
      • Decade-long study claims video games don't affect ...
      • FBI memo claims Anonymous has been hacking US gove...
      • ZTE Open smartphone with Firefox OS review!!!
      • Sony sells more than a million PlayStation 4s with...
      • Ouya unveils limited edition white console with do...
      • Qualcomm's $350 Toq smartwatch releases on Decembe...
      • A behind-the-scenes look at how YouTube handles an...
      • NFL and MLB ask the Supreme Court to hear a challe...
      • Trademark application points to impending Fallout ...
      • Raspberry Pi has now sold 2 million units, doubles...
      • Hackers breach vBulletin support forum using zero-...
      • Sony publishes guide to troubleshoot PlayStation 4...
      • 12 Ways Black Friday 2013 Will Be Different!!!
      • Apple iPad Air: The geekysupport Review!!!
      • VMware Tools now available for nested ESXi with th...
      • VMware Tools now available for nested ESXi with th...
      • VMware Tools now available for nested ESXi with th...
      • Prepare yourself for the looming deadline of Windo...
      • Final PS4 & Xbox One specs compared, why users uni...
      • What's the oldest gadget you still use regularly?!!!
      • Newly appointed FCC chairman calls for wireless ca...
      • ASRock unveils a pair of motherboards designed spe...
      • Europe allows airlines to install 3G and LTE netwo...
      • The PlayStation 4 is officially here, some systems...
      • Republic Wireless offers Moto X for $299 contract-...
      • FCC's Speed Test app for Android now available on ...
      • Jolla to launch inaugural smartphone with Sailfish...
      • Quantum computers looking more realistic with majo...
      • Samsung reportedly planning to launch smartphone w...
      • Minecraft: The Story of Mojang now available on Yo...
      • Jawbone's first wireless fitness tracker Up24 is a...
      • Yahoo to auction off more than 100 long-lost domai...
      • Computer History Museum publishes Apple II DOS sou...
      • CyanogenMod one-click installer for Android arrive...
      • PlayStation 4 Review: (In Progress), But Do You Ne...
      • MIT showcases impressive dynamic shape display tec...
      • snapchat turns down $3 billion acquisition offer f...
      • Intel's 9-series chipsets not expected to support ...
      • Xperia Z1 Review: Testing Sony's Latest Android Fl...
      • Google and HP pause sales of the Chromebook 11 fol...
      • AMD's upcoming mobile APUs make 'Jaguar' next-gen ...
      • 24 accidental scientific discoveries that reshaped...
      • Firefox OS Review!!!
      • IBM's new Watson supercomputer developer platform ...
      • Leaked Dragon Age: Inquisition video showcases com...
      • Asus reveals Chromecast-like Miracast Dongle, has ...
      • Double-sided YotaPhone will go on sale this holida...
      • New bill would give online video services protecti...
      • Coin is the all-in-one credit card designed to sli...
      • Blizzard says it was wrong to include offline mode...
      • Isis Mobile Wallet launches across the country wit...
      • Western Digital hoping for 5x larger hard drives w...
      • Hot PC Games for the 2013 Holiday Season!!!
      • Amazon and USPS team up to offer Sunday delivery!!!
      • A peek at the inside of Sony's PlayStation 4!!!
      • Smartphone adoption forecasted to reach 5.6 billio...
      • Microsoft's Xbox One arrives two weeks early for s...
      • Netflix and YouTube account for 50% of North Ameri...
      • Moto X customization with Moto Maker now available...
      • FCC seeks your help in testing mobile broadband sp...
      • Next iPhones to have large curved displays and bet...
      • Original iPod first went on sale 12 years ago with...
      • Latest Google Chrome beta makes it easy to locate ...
      • Microsoft releases hotfix for Windows 8.1 mouse ac...
      • Sony expects to sell three million PlayStation 4 c...
    • ►  October (297)
    • ►  September (51)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2012 (16)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2011 (22)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (6)
  • ►  2010 (8)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2009 (6)
    • ►  December (6)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile